Indian media was recently awash with incorrect reports claiming that the suspects accused of killing British Columbia Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar were no longer in custody. According to a CBC News report, numerous outlets in India propagated these unverified claims, leading to widespread misinformation.

Nijjar, a prominent Sikh leader and Canadian citizen, was fatally shot in Surrey, B.C., in June 2023. The case has garnered significant attention internationally, with speculation about the involvement of both local and external actors. Despite this, the suspects remain in custody, contrary to the false narratives circulating in Indian media.

This incident once again highlights a growing problem with parts of India's media, often accused of spreading fake news and sensationalism. Outlets known for unverified and biased reporting include some prominent television channels and digital platforms, which have been criticized for prioritizing viewership and political alignments over factual reporting.

India’s declining rank on the World Press Freedom Index—ranked 161 out of 180 countries in 2023—is a reflection of these challenges. Key reasons for the low ranking include:

Political Influence: Several media organizations are owned or controlled by entities aligned with the government, leading to biased reporting.

Suppression of Dissent: Journalists face threats, harassment, and even imprisonment for critical reporting.

Misinformation: The unchecked spread of fake news and propaganda undermines the credibility of journalism.

Polarization: Media often stokes communal and political divides to boost ratings.

These factors contribute to a media environment that struggles to fulfill its role as a watchdog for democracy, leading to the erosion of public trust. This latest instance of misinformation regarding the Nijjar case underscores the urgent need for journalistic accountability and adherence to ethical standards in reporting.